Introduction
A legal conflict has arisen between Ess Kay Gee Leisure (SKG) and Content materials Movement Pictures Productions Pvt. Ltd. in respect to the upcoming film Jatadhara. The dispute is about the rights to distribute the film. A disagreement has arisen regarding the materials that are owned by both of these businesses individually.
Ongoing Authorization Dispute
SKG and Content Material Motion Pictures are offering inconsistent narratives regarding contractual duties and intellectual property rights at the present time, which has resulted in the project being the subject of a protracted authorization dispute. This difficult dispute on permission is currently causing the mission to endure a great degree of trouble. This is a consequence of the difficult permission disagreement. At this very moment, we are having a discussion about a conflict that is still ongoing and will continue to have an impact on individuals.
Defamation Complaint and Denials
Despite the fact that Prernaa Arora has refuted the claims that have been made against her, the Jatadhara has nonetheless granted its blessing for the fight to take place after it has been approved. The plaintiff filed a complaint for defamation, and in addition to SKG data, the plaintiff requested damages in the amount of Rs. 50 crores.
SKG’s Legal Statement and Allegations
SKG’s Counsel Responds
Following the receipt of consent from SKG’s Counsel, new information has been discovered, which includes the various items listed below. In light of the most recent events, Vineet Dhanda, who is the approved attorney for SKG, has published a statement in response to the situation. It is included in the statement that a number of allegations have been made against Prernaa Arora, who is the producer.
Response to Public Rumors
It has been reported that Prernaa Arora and Jatadhara are reportedly implicated in approved factors. These reports are currently being circulated. According to the reports, this is the case. To view the statement that Vineet Dhanda has given in reaction to these reports, you may do so by clicking on the link that is provided here. These rumors have been flying around for quite some time, and the message that is being sent addresses them.
Arora Was Only a Witness
It is important to note that Arora was not a direct party to the settlement that was struck between SKG and Content Motion Pictures; rather, she was merely a witness to the agreement that was created between the two companies. It is of the utmost importance to emphasize that Arora did not take part in the settlement in a direct capacity.
Breach of Financial Commitment
Partial Investment Made
The disclosure that was made is directly responsible for the fact that this information has been brought to light so that it may be discussed.
The only amount that was provided was the amount that they had originally contributed. This is evidence that they did not live up to the expectations that were set for them, and it also reveals that they did not meet the expectations that were established for them.
Loss of IP Rights Claim
Because of the fact that they have committed this breach by their conduct, they have lost any claim that they could have had to the intellectual property rights that are associated with the project that is currently being discussed. This is because they have forfeited any claim that they might have had to these rights.
According to the findings of the investigation, the representations made by the firm that it proudly possesses fifty percent of the intellectual property rights regardless of whether or not it has defaulted on funding constitute a “breach of regulation” of the highest level.
Media Responsibility and Legal Threats
Legal Action in Bombay High Court
50 crores in the Bombay High Court.
Media Urged to Fact-Check
Given the disclosure, it is strongly recommended that media outlets verify the validity of the content before publishing it and remove any components that are deemed to be defamatory in order to avoid incurring legal sanctions.
Content Motion Pictures’ MoU Position
Reference to December 2024 MoU
The materials on Content Motion Pictures Productions Pvt. Ltd., which is associated with Rajtaru Studios Limited, made the information that was initially made available to the general public accessible to the general public as a whole. On March 12, 2025, this information was changed so that it was no longer available to the general public.
As stated in the declaration that was made when it was submitted, the corporation continues to own a fifty percent ownership in the intellectual property rights that Jatadhara possesses. This is the case even to this day.
This proclamation is founded on a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that was signed on December 23, 2024, with SKG, the manufacturing company led by producer Prernaa Arora and actor Shivin Narang.
Accusation of MoU Violation by SKG
Discover additionally asserts that SKG has violated the standards of this MoU and recommends business stakeholders to refrain from engaging in commercial transactions with SKG in relation to Jatadhara without first obtaining their license.
It also proposes the imposition of sanctioned fines for any transactions that are not approved to take place.
Director Venkat Kalyan’s Response
Rebuttal of Allegations
For the purpose of offering further clarification, Director Venkat Kalyan has issued the following statement in reaction to the situation. In response to these allegations, Venkat Kalyan, who is the writer and director of Jatadhara, has expressed his disapproval towards the allegations.
According to him, Jatadhara is the name of one of the shows that he has directed. According to what has been revealed, the claims that have been made against him are “false, baseless, and misleading.”
Financial Discrepancies Highlighted
There were twenty crores of rupees that were supposed to be awarded for the trip, but the corporation only donated sixty lakhs of rupees, according to what has been revealed.
Intent to Sue
Kalyan accused Content Motion Pictures Productions of failing to meet their financial commitments, incorrectly handling their accounts, and participating in behavior that was not professional.
He had the intention of filing a lawsuit against Content Motion Pictures Productions, stating that they had broken the terms of their contract, harassed him, and slandered him.
Uncertain Future of the Film
The commercial sector is waiting for new developments and legal rulings in order to determine who the genuine owner of the picture is and what the plan will be for its future.
Fraud Allegations Continue
Conclusion
The ongoing legal saga between SKG and Content Motion Pictures over the rights to Jatadhara highlights deeper issues of trust, contract enforcement, and professional accountability in the Indian entertainment industry. As the situation unfolds, both the public and industry stakeholders await clear rulings and transparent resolution to determine the true ownership and future of the film.